The question is evasive because the concept on which is built the question is more than evasive.
It’s not even a critic in my mouth. I’m learning a lot on the actual problematic of hobbyists, their trends also, from all these discussions with all of you. It’s pushing me to get out from the comfy submarine and i appreciate it. For a ton of different reasons.
Short and raw : If you don’t have any determined destination, talking about the best vehicles to buy is just venting. Yes 911 are nice and sturdy, but to reach the top of a mountain without roads, it’s better to bet on a light jeep.
They don’t exist. It’s just story telling.
Be rational. Do you seriously think that to build a competitive haze, a competitive yielder and a competitive stone-hammer … an unique phenotype profile can be applyed to these three cases universally ? For both sex ? And in adding the inherent constraints to release a stable feminized line on the top of that ?
By the accurate goals you have in mind, before launching the seeds. No goal, no control, no errors, no experience built.
“A transparent male is a gem”
It’s not a gem. Not even something rare and that “only the best can find”. It’s just a matter of education on strains. And i will not wipe the ass on that, no way.
Studying the main pedigrees and to highlight recurrent patterns from it is far enough, and everybody can do it just in using one of the numerous strains database available.
And to pass from the education to action, there is only one way : launching seeds.
Now, in surfing in the sense of the trend of “males are useless”, a “transparent male” is the strict definition of a reversed female. All this wind for nothing, really.