I agree. Facts are facts. I'm not challenging the facts. I'm challenging the interpretation of those facts. If you go to the original scientific papers there is no discussion about the implications on climate. If you talk to climatologists about the solar cycles it will not have near as much impact as anthropogenic driven causes that will increase temperatures.
Climate change is driven by both cow farts and the sun and a lot of other factors.
I don't have 30 minutes to watch the full video. I will try to later. But within the first few I see him starting to make some bullshit claims about thermomoters in the 1880s... there are multi proxy temperature records from things like tree rings. Let's remember individual scientists, despite their greatness at some things, can be very wrong: Peter Deusberg on AIDS for instance.