High male ratio

Prohibitionists have used the ‘no scientific evidence’ argument for a long while now while ignoring the fact that science is (financially) prohibited to research anything related to the plant. Anecdotal evidence is no evidence in their eyes even if people get (medical) relief from using. The same is happening here I’m afraid. It’s just ‘bro-science’ because nobody is researching it and the people using the ‘no science’ argument can’t or won’t research themselves but will still use the ‘no science’ card.

1 Like