Here is some info from my buddy âOOâ
Scientifically, root pruning has nothing to do with intersex traits. Certainly, an âintersexâ susceptible plant will more readily revert sex upon root pruning than a âstableâ sex.
Be that as it may, root pruning is not a form of stress to induce sex reversal but actually works quite similar to STS.
Roots and only roots build cytokinin, they also build strigolactones which in turn increase auxins and influences their transport. Removing the roots will completely deprive plants from cytokinins, partially from strigolactone, and indirectly lower the auxin content and alter its distribution. This causes an imbalance in hormone homoeostasis in favour of gibberellins. The latter are the main âmaleâ hormone whereas cytokinins and auxins are linked to âfemalenessâ (BTW auxin content in hemp is up to 30 fold higher in females then males). Itâs common knowledge that treatment with GA leads to female->male sex reversal and consequently pruning roots is the same, just âmore naturalâ [image] .
STS on the other hand, according to the latest findings, blocks copper channels (and does not inhibit ethylene production per se nor directly blocks ethylene perception). Anyway, a lack of copper (needed for ethylene synthesis) leads to a lower ethylene production. Ethylene is at least one reason why auxins cause âfemalenessâ (remember, auxins lead to increased ethylene production) and ethylene acts, at least in this regard, as GA antagonist. Again, a shift in hormonal equilibrium causes sex reversal. Consequently, one would have to call STS a form of nutrient (copper) starvation. By definition, nutrient starvation is also a form of stress. Hence, STS is stress induced sex reversal and will select for intersex plants [image] . That last sentence, ICMag users know that by experience, seems not true although I know many who think it is. [image]
Bottom line is: If you âbelieveâ STS a safe method, then root pruning is so too. If you donât like STS, donât prune roots either.