1st of all what i do, who i am and what's my life alike behind a virtual set of electrons & photons named Egzoset just ain't your business, hence calling for further justifications after moving the spotlights on the poster instead of a topic only serves cheap/lazy topic obstruction unworthy of YOUR approval, trying to shine under my shadow...
My reading (homework) was performed long long ago, too bad you're some 5 years too late to even contemplate any eventual/civilized dialog to continue such discussion.
Indeed, but i don't suppose it would be useful to reply that this is NOT the context i have in mind, so would you like to forge that as well? You, you, you???
Stating the obvious, more forging ahead i'm sure!
There's no problem doing with 13 hours of light, why not this too if one is prepared for the trade-offs?!
And you thought i didn't know? Fine. Probably 24h is fine too, but this yet has to be put into a comparative test instead of making theories which sound just like statements. For all i thought i knew, even "auto" plants still behave differently during the night, and yet doubts make me wish there were concrete evidence on this, but then it would no longer be a simple theory and hence i wouldn't be here in an attempt to debate it with cold temper after stranger rudeness... Of did we battle elsewhere before?...
Please re-read the thread for proper contextualization (or read it for the 1st time!...), i won't do it for you.
True. Or at least i'm prepared to accept that as true, without a demonstration...
FALSE. More forging here again, like it's a virus everywhere i dare to set foot! It must be my own fault and/or fate i guess. Pleas ask questions instead of making wild statements.
Thanks a bunch for the "if" precaution.
Now we're talking, except i don't believe i'm the guy you want to talk to!
Obviously 24h leaves no time-coherent signature but it still causes a "pedestal" rise in the overall consumption rate. No problem agreeing with that, but i don't like 24h, though i used to love my "autofems".
As for having twin 12/12 sessions synchronized that's not really innovative as that was part of my reading a long time ago. Which in fact is where i got my inspiration, equally helped by "GLR" related ideas... In any case it's not about a magic set of numbers, what i tried to illustrate which eluded your attention somehow is the suggestion that combining multiple independent sessions it must be possible to balance load in hope at least no temporal signature is left. Because it's one thing to look at a raw Watt vs Time graph, it's another understanding that superposition of daily records will tend to cause random reading to cancel while leaving a strong 12/12 or 16/8 signal as strong and clear as that of a metronome.
Now if my own personal experience matters to you this much then i suppose i must relate to an old story of my own, actually extracting a near-perfect 24h sine wave while trying to evaluate the noise floor (which occured many years ago in another life): long wiring behaved like an astronomical antenna picking up the earth's terrestrial influence on noise... Although 1 single day worth of records didn't raise suspicion the analysis of many daily samples proved to be an eye opener.
But i'm glad we agree that the elevated "pedestal" alike rise would be sufficient to attract attention as that's no more complicated than to extract time-coherent signals buried in noise from outer space, knowing what frequency to tune-in in advance!...
That's all the fair play i'm capable of at this moment considering these adverse circumstances.
Good day, have fun!!