Continuing the discussion from Landraces and heirloom (Part 2):
Wikipedia tells us that all claimed medical benefits of CBD are unproven or pseudoscience (except, of course, for FDA approved Epidiolex! Talk to your doctor today). It’s not really a reliable source for information anymore…
5 Likes
Thanks, I think I’ll back out and let it drop.
1 Like
Yeah… I don’t think this needs its own thread haha.
I will say I realized the article is for CBD as an isolated compound vs. full-spectrum extract of a high CBD cultivar, for example. So you’re right, benefits are limited/unverified. But dismissing all data/info outside of peer reviewed journals (especially when we’re talking about illegal substances) can sometimes give an incomplete picture on things, which was my issue. Hope you can understand that 
Anyways, I’m good with closing this thing @LemonadeJoe
2 Likes
Isolates often miss the medicinal mark, there is a lot of data supporting CBD benefits for various conditions but unsure if the isolated or concentrated derivatives are able to confer the same benefits
2 Likes