Just basic etiquette reminder, buddy. Small talk outside your conversations.
Pragmatically, when i click on the profile of DST and when i go in his growlog … you can see that he know his shit. It’s obvious. His lab is dialed, he have a turn over, i can roll his buds in my blunts, he even push with various toys … well. I know where i put a feet when he’s talking. It’s not a hierarchic level, it’s understanding from where he’s talking. I don’t think by example that we will the best friend on fast Dutch SOGs. But if ever i enter in argumentation with him a day, it will be with a round in hand to explain the stage of the plants, give yield/day ratios etc … in exchange of his point of view on a comfort zone that is not mine. The principle of equivalence somehow.
When i click on your profile … you should laugh less and take more in consideration the necessity past a point of discussion to enter in facts and demonstration. It’s impossible to have an argument of authority without showing that actually you’re doing what you say … and the results from this. That’s almost the strict definition of gas-lighting for me ^^
Not saying you that debating about convictions is bad or not, it’s the form more. And the necessary step where you take in count if you’re actually able to output an equivalence with your interlocutor.
It’s not about you particularly, i just take the occasion to expose something i find a bit recurrent in discussions these last times.