I mean the issue with that to me is what about kids who do the same thing
all that data is sitting somewhere on one of their servers
2 Likes
27 Likes
We’ve been chatting this last run on the other place. This is Weasel’s cut early sample around 63 days. Seems like there’s more action over here and I can’t get enough sour talk!
7 Likes
So I’m going to have some people that aren’t me do some smoke reports
and in case this template doesn’t exist here already
Here’s a good one
INFO
Tester Name :
Strain :
Method Smoked :
APPEARANCE
(insert photo here where possible)
SMELL
Dominant smell of bud :
Associated smells of bud :
TASTE
Dominant flavour :
Associated flavours :
Harsh/smoothness : (1-10, 1 being extremely harsh and 10 being extremely smooth)
- cough factor? : yes/no
BUZZ
Profile : Percentage of head to body (e.g. 80% head 20% body)
Potency : (1-10, 1 being extremely weak and 10 being extremely potent)
Duration : (approx length of buzz, from first hit)
Use : Daytime/Bedtime
Munchies? : yes/no
CHEMICAL ASTRINGENT
turpentine ()
metallic ()
ammonia () - urine () - vinegar ()
bleach ()
lotions () - plastics () - glues ()
SWEET
fruity () - berry () - black/blue/raspberry () - citrus () - orange () - lemon () - lime () - apple () - mango () - grape () - cherry () - tutti frutti ()
floral () - perfume () - blossom ()
minty () - methol () - spearmint () - peppermint ()
SPICY
woody () - incense () - hardwood () - sage () - juniper () - cedar () - pine ()
basil () - garlic () - dill () - clove () - parsley () - pepper ()
tobacco () - chocolate ()
MUSKY
earthy () - loam () - dirt () - musty () - dusty () - dry ()
animal () - bird () - rodent () - gamey () - skunky ()
botanical () - hay () - autumn leaves () - trees ()
I also saw these recently and I am fond of them to send to people
I think having something to look at helps
People who didn’t grow it’s opinions mean more then the growers in my opinion.
They’re for wine but still seems valid for herb
21 Likes
Here’s some more daywrecker diesel shots I found
Idk If I’ve posted them in my other thread but they belong here too
32 Likes
Thanks man
I’m really starting to miss taking pictures with those cheap method 7 knock offs and the hortilux blue HPS bulbs
LED’s take uglier photos in comparison it seems
6 Likes
I can agree with that. I tried taking over a hundred pictures of my last grow to get quality bud pics. Nothing came out looking really good for me. No depth of color. It’s weird.
2 Likes
I thought it was my potato ass camera
2 Likes
If I’m not mistaken they actually use CMH lights in studios and stuff as they have the best range of color or something or other
Will have to try that at some time
5 Likes
I love CMH, especially the proper Phillips 315w with its Phillips square wave ballast.
I did a lot of research for warehouses back in 2015 and 2016. Phillips made the 315CMH for gallery art shows. Art dealers pay top dollar for lights to showcase their paintings. And Art requires a very wide spectrum with as close to a flat peak as possible. Something like HPS has too many peaks and valleys, with too much disparity between each color along the spectrum, that it cancels some colors in favor of others. Having such a flat yet wide response, the CMH best mimics the Sun at around 20 or so degree latitude.
And, its perfect for Veg and Flower - so no need to change lighting when running both veg and flower in the same room
Ive run everything (except newer LEDs)
And that 315w CMH had the best expressions, did better than 400 MH, and was on par with 600w bulbs yet still had better nutrient cycling and better leaf expressions. The 315w runs surprisingly hot and needs more distance from plants than a 400 MH
Still, the best tent I ran was 600w MH, 1kw HPS, and a 400w Mercury Vapor in a 4x4!
Man, I miss MV bulbs. Though, it seems CMH hits all the peaks that MV did, but also a wider peak among the spectrums.
6 Likes
Used to do something similar to this with beer tasting. We called it Beer D&D.
3 Likes
are you talking about the same light here? sounds nice, how much hotter than a LED would you say?
1 Like
yup, same bulb
others have knocked off Philips releasing 315w -and other wattages - but its that Philips bulb and their proprietary ballast that makes the magic. Lost my old computer in the fire, so i dont have the files and pics to share comparing Lux of different bulbs, but yeah, its in its own category.
3 Likes
Unpopular opinion
Bruce Biggsbee kinda sucks at fore front nano specs and they’re manipulation of the plant
I spent 4 years making the perfect LED ligh
just shy of the amount of diodes in the gavita 700e
kicks… spyder, fluence and the ROi ones
Next up is the large panel dragon ones
Worst brand for money is HLG
I want @LemonadeJoe to let me do some kind of sponsor program where some models can be given
Out for very low (youd have to be a week skilled grower)
it’s not a come one come app more try outs
it sucks seeing this whole community missing out on something so great because other Chinese sellers can be unreliable
they have a FIVE YEAR WATRANTY ON ALL PARTS
beat that name brands
24 Likes
Did I read correctly low cost led lights?
2 Likes
Yes I would need proof your a capable grower
and the only way to show joe these lights are the best on the market is to get you guys to run some
you all would be dealing with me
They’d all ship from USA
and I hope I have enough of a pull around here for people to trust me when I say something works
I already approached joe which kinda sucks as now I feel uncomfortable praising them as much as I do but go literally anywhere I’m on and I argue for them to the death
I broke my own bar settin got up, they send a new one im 2 days had it in 4
you can jay contact me if you’d like
@admin
this is the only way I can think of to prove you providing these lights would benefit your community in so many ways
I can say what is exactly in them
But every state of the art spectrum is included with highest quality diodes
And just seriously great service
10 Likes