Your reasoning has no logic behind it. People never bred ruderalis out of drug-type Cannabis cultivars, certainly not the modern breeders you mentioned. They built their hybrid lines on the work of farmers generations before them.
Also an F20 would be the 20th inbred generation from an original hybrid crossing, not a backcross. And talk about unnatural, Cannabis is an outcrossing species. Such high rates of inbreeding are not normal in Cannabis populations and can lead to a lot of issues with the accumulation of deleterious recessive alleles.
The autoflower gene was introduced to drug type Cannabis for its desired phenotype (day-neutral flowering). Introgressing desired traits from wild crop relatives is par for the course in real plant breeding. They search landraces of crops for disease resistance genes than introgress them into desired crop cultivars. This is no different. This is plant breeding.
You don’t need to reverse rudaralis to breed with it, you could have a normal-sex, autoflower breeding program. That is why, as I said, these are separate issues really. Regardless, like I also said, triggering a fully female plant to reverse sex with an exogenous chemical does not change its genetics; therefor there is no increase in monecious plants compared to traditional breeding.