I would say this is the only reason to flush, to clean the medium when improperly amended.
Personally, I use no medium. Which may be one reason why I have no need to flush.
One question I ask myself when looking at a new technique, or product, or strain, is “Do people who need to make money doing this, use it?”, which generally has the same answer as “Can this product/technique/strain do what it claims” because if it can, and it is worth it, then a business somewhere knows this and is making more profit from doing it, using it, or growing it.
One way of making more profit is simply to have a higher quality product (the reason behind why people flush AFAIK) so to my mind, if it was worth doing then we would see ‘flushed’ fruit and other food, even if only at Harrods or other places that like to sell stuff at the absolute upper limit of quality (and price).
If nothing else, you would see food like that at the expensive sort of place that sell homeopathy, organic, local etc and it is not even in that sort of place.
To my mind, the lack of any food producer selling food which has been nutrient deprived during the last stages of ripening says a lot. If it made a positive difference, they would do it.
I really feel that this is an area where some proper double blind testing needs doing. One test would be to spectrally analyse some dried flowers to see their chemical composition from clones grown in the same hydro system. At a certain point, one set would continue getting feed, the other would flush. After harvest, the chemical make-up of each would be examined, then again after a proper cure. This would show which, if any, chemicals were flushed from the plant.
Obviously smoking would need to happen also to gauge potency and quality of smoke
Like the big HPS vs LED test (very interested in seeing the results of that in a few weeks), if we do not run the tests, all we are doing is shouting in the wind…