That’s interesting - you’d think that access to top bin, maybe otherwise unreleased, Osram white diodes would be one of the key advantages to being part of the Osram empire. Does Fluence actually disclose their diode mix? I’ve seen reported statements from company reps that were pretty squirrelly about their diode mixes in the past. One commenter said he had been told that they used “whatever the best diodes that were available” depending on market availability and pricing. Yikes.
From the Fluence website, under “technology”:
“All Fluence systems are built with the latest LED technology from the world’s top semiconductor manufacturers — including Osram, Samsung and LG.”
Pretty cagey. I don’t know of another light manufacturer that uses LG diodes. Or rather “includes” them in a partial list of disclosed vendors of the most critical technological components of their products.
I really want to love Fluence and admire their products. I really do. But the diodes are everything in LED. Would you pay extra for a bottle of water from a company that said it sourced its water from some of the purest sources on the planet, including the Swiss Alps, the Polynesian rainforest, and Artic icebergs; or would you prefer the company that said it sourced its water exclusively from the XYZ Glacier in Norway (tested, proven, chemical analysis available)?
I’ll stop with the Fluence bashing now, I know @Northern_Loki wants to keep this thread focused on independent testing and analysis of different lamps. I only bring it up because the company’s founder and chief of research comes out of the DIY grow light community, and has made such public statements about what consumers should demand in terms of technical disclosure from light manufacturers. Their actual disclosure falls far short of that, and is basically indistinguishable from the Alibaba fabricators that claim they use top quality components “like Cree, Samsung and Epistar”.