2018 light efficiency ultimate battle

That fluence looks good. Might pull trigger after 1st of year if can expand some. I did research Fluence some years back but seems like they only had larger expensive greenhouse lights then…can’t remember!

I grow with a USA made blurple and a Cob in small space and spend around $25 a month for more pot than I can smoke (and that includes fans and veg closet).

I get past the penetration thing by side lighting and topping for 4 main colas to keep em short in 5 gal buckets.

My main lights:
https://advancedledlights.com/products/led-grow-lights/ds-xte-200/

My grow: Bez's 2X2 Blurple, COB, and Fluorescent Closet Grow - #16 by bezalom

If not Fluence next time maybe some DIY quantum board. As mentioned above already that the pace at which this technology is progressing now then who knows what the next advancement will bring.

I like the 300-400 watts I use (low electric bill). Biggest problem I have found from HPS to LED (at least for me) is lack of transpiration due to lack of heat. I actually added shop lights etc. to bring my temps up.

2 Likes

I’ve checked out those Timber Lights and very much like Rapid Led (almost bought the Timber but Rapid had a tax free/ and free shipping on Amazon.

Those Platinum are made in China and can read many horror stories if sorted by default in Amazon reviews of them. Also, China known to spam positive reviews on Amazon (can even tell many by same weird broken English).

2 Likes

9.9 times out of 10 the expensive lights you buy in north america are manufactured in china. the ones manufactured in america are even more expensive…

eg $65 for quantum board 304 made in china (on sale from 75) vs. $99 for qb288 made in america (on sale from $150!) vs $20 for near identical quantum board 304 direct from china (including heatsink!)

ChilLED gets their PCBs made in china and places the diode chips in america. fluence says “built in america” but does that mean they’re just putting the casing on a chinese PCB? not sure

i think the samsung LM301B is from mid 2017 … at least the earliest design files etc on the website are … but youre right those aren’t widely adopted yet

1 Like

The fact Samsung put out a new one, is to me only a stronger indication that china have copied the 2015 technoligy. :smiley:

Im sure the brand Chips in the end give more light, on the other hand it seems that the cheap LED’s work all right for the money.

1 Like

I’m 99% sure that they are not doing the surface mounting themselves either. Samsung chips made in Korea if memory serves. Then those go to China and soldered into PCBs. Assembled in America? Sure, designed in America, yep. But almost ALL electronics come from over seas.

5 Likes

I don’t want to spam your thread with pictures though I am almost finished with my light comparative thread over on Grasscity (Cackleberry grow) comparing 315w cmh, 400w hid and diy 180w quantumboard120’s only going by recommended watts per square foot as I can’t wrap my mind around par, umol etc. though I do my best to try to understand. Anyhow, so far…

CMH - Won for veg and bud building
QB - Won for flowering transition stretch
HID - struggling all the way around

I did have a couple auto’s that reacted a bit different…
Blue dreamatic did best with the CMH
Brooklyn Sunrise did best with the QB’s…was not run with the hid as the seed didn’t make it

I think everyone that can do their own comparisons absolutely should to find out what is going to work best in their environments and grow style as they are all unique being adapted to what suits individual lifestyle’s :wink:

3 Likes

thanks for input. Wouldn’t you think DIY kits are better than the more expensive units?

I laugh at the people who still think China equals garbage when 90% of the stuff is made there. The amount of times I found suppliers of the big brands is just stupid.

For sure they are not all the same and some are garbage or suffer QC issues. If you don’t have previous experience with a factory it’s a kind of hit or miss game.

Is there anything cooking better than the LM301B that you are aware?

1 Like

ahah I gave a similar answer. Some of them try to hide so you don’t go on ali and get same tech for half the price.

Now, you had 180w led against 315wcmh.

What would you think it would happen if you had 315 watts of led instead of only 180w?

1 Like

they didn’t ‘copy’ the technology … they use samsung brand diodes… most of the LED fixtures are manufactured in china, chinese PCB manufacturers just fuck over their clients by selling their products and designs behind their back… or else they slightly modify the design so its not breaking their contracts… samsung is constantly developing new technology,… the LM301B isn’t even the newest diode, i think it’s just the highest efficiency per dollar atm… you can get all the diodes from chinese distributors

HLG has an agreement with samsung now … they’ll be sourcing their diodes directly from samsung now instead of a chinese distributor, and their new fixtures will be branded samsung i believe

3 Likes

Im fairly sure the chips I got, is not Samsung chips but chinese copies. :wink:

The chips I am using is “noname” and the price alone, should make that obvious.
I just ordered 10 strips with 72 chips on each.
I pay 1.2 for a single 72 chip strip, thats 0.01 per chip.
This is incl the alu strip and shipping, of a “ready to use” product.

Even as unmounted chips, Im gonna pay a minimum of 0.1$ for a Samsung chip, about 10x what I pay for the strip.

Besids next to each other, there is a fairly big difference in the chips, where the samsung chip have a signature shape.

My chips don’t have thouse corner markings, they are just square and if your chip don’t look like that.
It’s a copy, and not a original Samsung chip.

5 Likes

Just before my light comparison, I ran 4 qb120’s at max for 70w each = 280w in one of the 3x3x8 cabinet’s with Laughing Buddha in a 30gallon pot…shared with a 3Bears auto. LB got away from me and chopped her in half twice…1 time at 6wks of veg and 1 time a week after light flip - she still skyrocketed to 7.5’ and needed additional light to penetrate her canopy better so tried adding 2 more qb120’s on the sides and ended up taking them out after a week and thinned her out…harvested 136.9grams = 1.71gpw dry at almost 13wks of flower.

I figure if I were to continue with the qb’s in that cabinet, I would definitely throw in 6 from the get go though turn them down to 60w each as they seem to be brighter. Now the comparison is almost over, I think the CMH is doing a much better job in the “bigger” 3x3x8 cabinets and will leave 3 qb’s running at 60w each in the “smaller” 2x3x4 cabinets and throw in a reptile light to compensate for the missing uva/b

1 Like

There is a fairly long thread on here about gm/watt, verses gm/sq meter, verses other ways to measure efficiency.

We pretty much decided that there is no single “perfect” way to measure efficiency.

The problem with gm/watt, and gm/sq meter is that neither one takes time into consideration.

For example, say you have two growers that are using the same exact lights, and the same exact tent, and the same exact plants, all from the same mother, and both grow the same way with the same nutes, same temps, etc etc etc.

BUT… one of them veges his plants for 2 months and the other one veges for 3 months.

If they both get the same number of grams at harvest, they would both have the same gm/watt and the same gm/sq meter, but the one with the shorter grow time would have saved money with the shorter time.

Or one guy grows 3 plant in a 100 sq ft room with three lights, and the other one grows the same plants in a 7 sq ft tent with one light. The guy with the bigger room may get more yield because he has space to spread out the plants in a bigger SCROG which gave him more yield per plant.

Which is more “efficient”, and what is the best way to judge that?

We did agree that no single point of comparison was really much use when comparing two different grows. Just doing a single point of comparison will always result in inaccurate comparisons. In the end, we couldnt agree on what would be a perfect method - none of them really work for all situations. We did agree that time and size of the grow were important though. We also talked about total cost, but then do you include initial investment, or just daily costs, or costs over the main grow or total costs, or?

On the other hand, if you are just interested in how well your personal grow is doing, and you are always using the same basic setup as far as lights, space etc, then you can pick any single point you want to see if your grows are doing better or worse from one grow to the next.
.

The problem with doing that is you will never buy an LED light, or a new TV or a new phone, or etc etc. :smiley: Tech is always going to be changing, and improving and getting cheaper and better. Moore’s Law is a real thing.

I think another advantage to LED’s is that you have the option of keeping the drivers in the tent if you need more heat, or you can locate them outside the tent if you have too much heat.

2 Likes

I also found some “rolls” that say to have these samsung chips but they seem way to cheap. I know because they buy them in bulk they get excellent prices but I believe there are some fakes around also.

I believe if you are testing efficiency gram per watt, needs to be done with same strain same grower, same everything. Only different light setups :wink:

But yes to measure efficiency there is no golden ratio. This thread is more focused on how to get the most of your watt’s driven to your lights. Doesn’t matter cost of the setup, etc…

Some say Moore’s Law is dying but I think we will continue to evolve pretty quick. I think I’m gonna invest in a small are and see where it takes me.

You just gave me an idea to make a long cord of the driver so I can put inside or outside of the grow :slight_smile:

2 Likes

Not one mention of PAR or any of its metrics that I saw…

Theres no point anymore in side by sides or asking questions like “which one will yield the most” because we can literally look at the metrics that should (if its not, don’t buy) be available from the manufacturer and that will tell us the output of that unit. I’m not talking lumens either - im growing plants not taking photographs or lighting my living room.

3 Likes

The other thing to take into consideration is everyone grows different. People using training to maximize yield in their given spaces, SOG growers, soil/hydro… Too many variables to go simply off the output of a light system.

I want to see someone grow using the exact same variables except for the light. Someone who’s got their shit dialed in, doesn’t have grow to grow issues, lets see them use different lights and see what happens. :slight_smile:

3 Likes

I have changed from hps to cmh (315w) and now recently cobs and solstrips and iv been growing ( occasionally ) a strain from Jan 2016’ with them all , and though im still only half way through flo with a couple of clones with the solstrips , which are great btw, but i had the best results with the 315w cmh/lec with this strain ( kaia Kush - apothecary), but heat was/is a small issue but i will use the cmh again in the winter months… but i will always use my solstrips.!
( just saying, ),
Happy growing
Gaz

3 Likes

What if you got one of these for side and under lighting?