Anyone forced the senescence coup de Gras via blackout?

That’s the context that is needed here. I believe Bugbee was debunking the 48-hours of darkness “Bro-myth.”

He was apparently stumped as to why anyone would believe starving a struggling plant could be beneficial and in an off-hand manner suggested that maybe 48-hours of light could be beneficial but not deprivation.

He wasn’t endorsing 48-hours of light but rather dismissing the idea that there could be any sort of logic to believing a possible benefit could be derived from depriving the plant of light.

Essentially he was saying giving it 48-hours of uninterrupted light makes more sense than the opposite.

But he wasn’t endorsing that as a legitimate method IMO.

7 Likes