Science is not nature itself.
The Sciences are tools that we use to support our findings in nature.
Science brings about a common understanding of nature that we can all relate to. Science doesn’t mean that we are in 100% agreement, that’s why new studies are coming out daily.
One man’s science is based on his study criteria. In many cases certain unexplained or unpredictable criteria is left out to to make the study more predictable. That’s why science must be peer reviewed. The contradictions will always arise. So scientists manipulate the input in such a way that their claim cannot be disputed.
In that way it can be repeated, But only under certain conditions. In layman terms, the contest is rigged to support the science.
It kinda like saying a plant has 32% thc when it actually has 26% thc and another 6% other cannabinoids. ± 10% error. Peace brothers. Let’s just breed our gear as best that we can.
3 Likes
actually if you want to see examples of human inbreeding look into the House of Habsburg royal line some of them were so deformed they couldn’t even close their mouths.
3 Likes
So a bj has less risk 
I agree with that. I did 4 fem seeds. 2 where the same the other two looked the same. It was crazy. I thought it was the light doing it. Good reading. Peace
1 Like
Can you expand on the reasoning behind this post? You explain things so well. I just need to peel the onion back another layer to understand fully. Are you referring to his ability to test multiple offsprings to see which mom passes on exactly what you want?
Subsequently with the idea of co op seed runs here and controlling the pollen you could test at a much higher volume.