Yes, same here for 4 decades.
Smoke’dem males then decide.
We had 7 desirable plants show out of a little over 1000 plants. We found what we were looking for.
Freakshow(Humboldt’19) but now in Automatic form, which at F7 or so. now.
Checking for herm is simple.
Give them heat stress and you will see if the plant is herm.
Education, that the seeds, that u can trade here are 100% better then what most of the companies are trying, these white label bulk seed guys.
Mr Nice wasn’t really around much in the “grow journal” days, except on the original overgrow, which is now gone.
But the fact of the matter is Shanti was a massive influence on almost every legendary breeder in modern history. Subcool apprenticed under Shanti personally.
Well it’s just nothing new.
Don’t really get why you are so excited about a Methode invented in the early 1980s.
Maybe inform yourself next time before opening a post and hyping a known technique as the next big thing.
Several threads / post on icmag from Sam the Skunkman / from Nevil on Mr.Nice as pointed out from @hempy.
Don’t act like on .ch here, it wasn’t pleasant there it’s not going to be pleasant here.
Hey, nice to see you here from grower.ch they are toxic still there? Ich Wette ja
Dort wurde ich ja Angegriffen von HighKe und Co. dass ich meine Seeds verschenken möchte
Personally, iam excited because i could test my males, before i breed with them. I didnt knew about that.
If people post like maniacs and don’t read what other people answer it’s not really being toxic but really more being annoyed.
Well that’s great for you but doesn’t change the fact that a short google search would have provided you with the fact that it’s nothing new. and a quiet known technique.
[at least if you are into breeding]
Shabud talked about reversals quite often on podcasts over the last few months.
I thought natural state was monoecious.
@Tonygreen on this.
Cannabis is naturally monoecious, we made it dioecious;
We made it dioecious, barely! Natural state is monoecious!
So is it such a horrible thing to make a topic for this accessible to the new guys???
If you already know about this, then enlighten us rather than just stand on your pedestal of knowledge looking down on us. It’s situations like this that made it so OP didn’t know it was common knowledge. Rather than post it in an easily accessible spot for the world to share and make it common knowledge, it appears you think everyone should have to already know what they’re in search of ahead of time so they can Google it???
This is why people call cannabis breeders gatekeepers right here!!
Of course not, but if you open a new topic and want to discuss it maybe you should inform yourself beforehand.
Maybe include the paper that discovered the shit?
Neither am I standing on anything, nor am I looking down on anybody.
I shared that there are post from Sam, Neville and Podcast Interviews with Shabud on this topic.
Nope, but before you start threads inform yourself, because in the end that helps the discussion way more than opening a thread with a title straight from the Bild Newspaper.
In order to have a discussion one needs to be informed, otherwise it’s more like a lecture.
For example, why does Shabud says that he doesn’t and also would not recommend smoking the male sprayed with Florell / Etephone because it’s highly toxic, while Sam the Skunkman says that It should be safe to consume because the florell / etephone should transform / convert to Ethelyn.
Maybe talk about how it transforms, because you sure as hell are not going to get a genuine looking female like it’s the case with female reversals.
Maybe talk about both the quotes from Nevil and Sam regarding YY.
There would be really interesting stuff to discuss but you need to be informed first. But sure instead let us circle jerk and hype shanti.
There is a Difference between wanting to have a discussion and not wanting to spit you your food in your mouth.
We can play the game:
I googled it, and found out that it is common knowledge, but then i would not started this thread, maybe a guy who is starting breeding (like me), is happy that he find’s that thread? And he has one more tool in his hand to test his males, step up his pollen chuckers / Breeding game.
I see that from my perspective.
So we could discuss that - because its so old, is it to old, is it still valid? for that this thread was for.
Thats i wanted to ask you guys, that have more experience, to learn and step my game up.
I’m going with insufficient evidence that it’s safe to smoke, so I’m not smoking.
Also, there’s another school of thought about male selection. At least I’ve had the thought-I don’t know if it’s an actual school. I select for health and vigor. I guess if I was seeking loudness or odors and need more reasons to cull, I’ll do stem rubs.
Then pollinate the selected female(s) with several males instead of just one. My point being that there wouldn’t be a need to reverse a male to smoke it.
But you can always reverse a male and have it lab-tested… Or reverse a male and make seeds to test.
Don’t think so
Well, personally I favor threads with information.
Again not reading what other people write, I will not repeat myself for you over and over.
What do you want to discuss I you have no informations what so ever? Did you even start reading into the topic?
Chimera: How to select males : Don’t
Yeah… Exactly!
Well I would handle that the same way, luckily I know a phd chemist, I am gonna ask him next time I see him.
No. Take any monoecious hemp line and stick it in a field for a few years and when you come back you’ll have a field of dioecious plants.
Genetic Architecture of Flowering Time and Sex Determination in Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.): A Genome-Wide Association Study - PMC).