Following Up on Previous Discussion:
Continuing the conversation from August Platform Upgrade Complete, I’d like to gather more feedback regarding photo uploads in posts.
What is the ideal number of photos per post?
Please consider this from both perspectives: as an uploader/poster and as a reader.
Having more photos in a post can be convenient for the uploader, as it reduces the need to carefully select which images to include, saving time. However, from a reader’s point of view, sometimes less is more, especially if the photos are thoughtfully curated.
Personally, I find posts that are concise and to the point easier to follow, which helps me keep track of my place in the thread (A single post represents a minimal increment on the navigational timeline). Additionally, I prefer when photos include at least a basic description of the content, providing context and details. In contrast, some users, particularly newer ones, might tend to post just a title followed by a series of photos, similar to what they may be accustomed to on social media. However, without accompanying information, the post’s informative value is significantly diminished. I want the details: the strain, the growth stage, the media used, information about the grow room, and more.
Currently, there is no limit on the number of photos per post, nor do we plan to impose one. However, there are other considerations that could affect the overall user experience.
So, let’s move on to a polls:
- 0-5
- 6-10
- 11-15
- 16-20
- 20+
- Yes, optionally
- Yes, mandatory
- No
- I don’t care
Go to the Poll results: What is the Ideal Number of Photos per Post? - #28 by LemonadeJoe