It’s not, PCR is just the process to decode the DNA.
Gmo because you simply can’t have male from femzd, and even with reg pollination on femzd it produces unrecoverable hermies.
That’s not at all what GMO means, you shouldn’t just throw around buzzwords like that, it doesn’t help make your point
My point of view is what it is, definition of common sense.
Common sense: the most scientific sense.
Absolutely mystical ^^
Your point of view doesn’t change the definition of something though.
Reversal fun : that’s not because you like femzd that femzd aren’t GMO!
I grow many times more regs than fems…by a lot.
You not liking something doesn’t make it something else you don’t like. GMO has a definition and it’s no where close to what making feminized seeds is.
Feminized seed’s genome is altered and modified, bar point!
Not recognizing this is scientism!
That’s like saying you are GMO because your parents DNA was “altered” to make your DNA. For feminized seeds to be unnatural land race plants would need to never hermie, which they do. When a breeder selects a plant to breed with, is that gmo because the breeder isn’t allowing for open pollination? Of course not, that’d be silly to say.
Extrapolating a definition can change a point of view but not its natural integrity.
Hermie from landrace and hermie from feminization do not have the same process of appearance.
They both result in the same genetic code, there’s nothing external changing the DNA whether the fems are made witb cobolt, STS, cs or a plant just herming
Is there a DNA study of femzd??
This is getting interesting
Disagree. Circular.
That’s not the real definition of where is going this discussion
Its like someone keeps hitting the reset button to reboot but it just hangs there Bootstrapping into Corrupt flows of data
I don’t see anyone discussing the merits of hyperfems either.