Salutations,
Bigot anti-cannabic prohibitionism based on story-teller “science” yet to be tested, with its foundations in half-truths and biased views on consumers called “naive”, while jumping from a vague notion of some CBD Ratio (assuming it’s being compared to THC) to an even more ambiguous definition of “potency” - e.g. go figure if it’s supposed to be THC alone…
In other words that deceiving UK article is going back to THC % expressed in absolute values again, just as in my own province not so long ago:
Truth is @ 1 % THC it doesn’t take much CBD at all to ruin the deal completely, not to mention i’d fear my vaporizer-pipe just wouldn’t function correctly anymore - on top of being exposed to an excessive amount of vegetal substrate potentially infused with pesticides and other contaminants.
Anyway non-consumers from UK trying to decide “what’s best” shall systematically translate as improved vilification! As far as i can tell…
Good day, have fun!! 