The Tribes should be given free rein to provide cannabis to eager consumers.
Based upon their “sovereign nation” or "sovereign authority"legal status they should, IMO, be able to sell cannabis without the absurdly high rates of state tax.
…
4 Likes
What a concept!
Casinos and cannabis.
99%
3 Likes
Well, this is disappointing.
…
http://pix11.com/2018/02/27/judge-tosses-lawsuit-challenging-federal-marijuana-laws/amp/
4 Likes
What a pussy! Too afraid to do what is right and risk a comfortable job. I hope history remembers what he was too afraid to do. How many more citizens will be harassed and thrown in cages while he draws his salary and sits in his seven figure New York apartment. 
3 Likes
They should just move the federal courthouse to Pfizer corporate headquarters. I’m sure it would fit nicely into one of the conference rooms.
4 Likes
Salutations,
It’s most shocking to read and i’m worried that’s only one more bigot anti-cannabic prohibitionist hint in preparation of the 2019 UN meeting on drugs. Both USA and Canada seem determined to do perform some politically-convenient moon-walking so far, coïncidence?? I just don’t believe so.
These last few days in my Canuck province we were sent all sorts of cryptic “messages” by our national mass-media TV and printed press. At some point i felt it translated into something equivalent to “We’re blood-thursty and quite ready to KILL artisan-gardeners next spring!”, including their “stoner$”/“droÿé$” friends, euh…
M’well, after some extensive deceiphering i’ll admit. But the thing is our “elite” politicians and para-military police won’t say the opposite version anyway: which is a path they won’t walk unless it’s much too late - again. Because they never know when to stop.
In The Name Of Children…
Good day, have fun!! 
4 Likes
The DEA has been complicit in thwarting any changes. They are making piles of money holding patents for cannabis.
United States of Hypocrites.
5 Likes
U.S. Patent No. 6,630,507 was granted to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in 2003.
This is how long the government has been actively holding nontoxic, safe treatment from adults and children suffering from Parkinsons, various cancers and side effects from cancer treatment, PTSD, menstrual cramps, and numerous other ailments. Think about that. Talk about this with friends, this should be a topic that people want to engage in.
4 Likes
that patents set to expire this year or next isnt it? weird how they can argue zero medical value while simultaneously holding patents for medical uses
edit: april 21, 2019
5 Likes
Salutations,
This study actually appeared to validate said USA patent a long while ago:
Too bad our Canuck self-serving politicians rely on brains which prove consistently slow at picking up sufficient processing speed…
http://oi58.tinypic.com/24lsk0z.gif
Or maybe they’re simply pretending.
Good day, have fun!! 
5 Likes
Their brains are lacking the necessary ingredient.
The same one they want to deny everyone else.
Strange behavior.
99%
2 Likes
Reefer Madness much?
People have been smoking pure hash for thousands of years, but the new “super strength skunk” strains on the streets of the UK will somehow make you psychotic?
4 Likes
Why does everybody hide this shit from me?! Where can i get these seeds? Ha! Ha! 
8 Likes
this is why I just ordered some skunk seeds from Holland! I want IN on this super-weed. 
4 Likes
Salutations,
Bigot anti-cannabic prohibitionism based on story-teller “science” yet to be tested, with its foundations in half-truths and biased views on consumers called “naive”, while jumping from a vague notion of some CBD Ratio (assuming it’s being compared to THC) to an even more ambiguous definition of “potency” - e.g. go figure if it’s supposed to be THC alone…
In other words that deceiving UK article is going back to THC % expressed in absolute values again, just as in my own province not so long ago:
Truth is @ 1 % THC it doesn’t take much CBD at all to ruin the deal completely, not to mention i’d fear my vaporizer-pipe just wouldn’t function correctly anymore - on top of being exposed to an excessive amount of vegetal substrate potentially infused with pesticides and other contaminants.
Anyway non-consumers from UK trying to decide “what’s best” shall systematically translate as improved vilification! As far as i can tell…
Good day, have fun!!
4 Likes
When I once was in a not too nice place, they at least tested my weed for me and told me it was 27%, which I was not too unhappy with.
Seeing in the article that there are strains over 35%, well that’s a bit mental.
2 Likes
Hahaha.
That is the most purely asinine article about cannabis that I have read in quite some time. A truly scurrilous screed, totally devoid of facts.
A flailing, sputtering work of pathetically desperate propaganda.
Albeit, somewhat entertaining.
Hahahaha!
3 Likes
Salutations MicroDoser,
That would imply over 1 third of the flower weight is located in its trichome secretory vesicle, right? Which sounds as THC-centric as it can get, for all purposes!
Personally i’d never support any form of 3rd-party socio-toxic interference leading to more prohibition, though at 35 % THC i see no use except for medical applications and development of new hybrid genetics by advanced cultivators. So, assuming 35 % as the ultimate maximum amount of noble molecules i’d want to try something with some more balance in mind; why not 15 ~ 20 % THC, 3 ~ 15 % CBD (depending on the mission…) and the rest distributed between CBN, terpenes, flavonoïds and more.
My objective would be to cover a vast palette capable of meeting every possible expectations, inclusively please!
Alternately lets take note the zealots just love to juxtapose various disparate things like cannabis vs smoking, THC substance vs “criminal”/“recreative” intoxication, CBD substance vs “medical-and-yet-overtaxed” (cash-cow) speculation, potency vs equilibrium (THC % vs THC/CBD ratio), etc., etc.
Good day, have fun!!
3 Likes
Do not despair, common sense and justice will eventually prevail.
Excerpt from article:
Michael Hiller, the attorney serving as lead counsel to the plaintiffs in the federal lawsuit, said in a statement on Monday evening that his clients plan to appeal the court’s ruling, vowing that “this case will continue to move forward.”
“Resigning the plaintiffs to the petitioning administrative process is tantamount to a death sentence for those patients who need cannabis to live,” Hiller said. “The time has come for the courts to abandon decades-old precedent, notched with obsolete legal technicalities, and catch up with modern science and contemporary principles of constitutional law.”
…
https://www.bing-amp.com/c/amp.timeinc.net/fortune/2018/02/27/federal-judge-dismiss-lawsuit-marijuana-legalization-jeff-sessions
3 Likes
Unbelievable.
All this over a freakin’ plant!
5 Likes