ok, why do i apply balck african to african origin.
well, people told that its mexican in fact, and people told its a random hybrid, also people told its just african.
so:
principially the highdescription has similarities to african. and very short: yes there was congolese, just strains collected in Congo that were veeeeeeeeeeery speical…
so, the balck african was reported to be balck. Yes, and african collected strains were reported to be black.
also african strains are reported to be among “enrergizing” “caffeinlike” “fighter type of effect” in its effect. thats a common direction of african landraces…
And yet again, the “black african” wich we dont know if its something compleetly else, tadadada: had if i recall right this fighter-type of qulity.
So, theoretically you could come to conclusion it is just african collected. possibly… thats all. Also dj short did never imply its from somewhere else… the opposite, he talked about those african tribe who grew it (acording him)
anyway… the main point was that shortflowering trippy weeds are often found in Landraces, whatever Landraces now are, hybrids, doesent matter, but this was the point… so if youre openminded and take “black african” from the list of shortflowering tripweeds. Then youre still left with 10 weeker Mexican that hit the highest score for a Mexican Landrace hunter… i dint hundert percent understand his verdict, but thats basically what he said, roundabout.
Same with a Durban that made people hallucinate, and im slightly foggy, but i recall it was a 10 weeker aswell…
overall, thin data wether black african was now just african (acording dj short it was i think) , you can adress trippy 10shortflowering weed to landrace regions of legendary status.
I think Afghani i had one hallucination report too. forgot this. I just most often heard from thes trippy short landraces, i cant change this fact. i cant, the facts i cant change. And imho i cant talk more softspoken really, i try to make no strong conclusions, and often plainly deny any determining conclusion… so i dont know where you see such a strong assumtion in it… Trust me, if i would find more hallucinogenic Hybrids then i would probably be interested… Oh i forgot nj piff, but i read 100s sides about NY piff, and i cant say if it was a landrace or a hybrid… even if it was, now we are in the 16 weeker territory. and hell i have much more tripreports from 16 weeker landraces, trust me.
the idea that i m misslead by wrong labelings where a landrace bud came from is also questionable.
i have reports from vietnam, guess from who? from soliders who smoked the plants they found, or what was sold in vietnam.
its super clear for this region, undeniable that THERE was it COLLECTED. im not 15 years old, i wuestion what i have, and also for Southamerica there are 1st hand reports… i see very little chance for beeing mistacken on that one… Again, i serched long and openmindedfor TRIPWEED, hell i didnt trust one, not two, not 3, no, like 10 tripreports to heaven… thats were i am now for vietnam/thailand, like 3 Tripreports for congo, and many almost trips, dunno how to say, and like 10 very high reports for Middleamerica,. thats almost shure … its always the same story from where the real stuff was experienced… especially for vietnam. im almost thingking: here we go again when i find a new tripreport. lol
(i dont know why it writes this in Fat letters)
Also incase you understand my use my wording LAndrace as calim, no , thats just the word we use for a Strain collected in a certain area. there comes no claim with it… thats how we speak, and of corse a landrace CAN be hybredized. thats linguistically a perfect statement
And no, im not mistacken by columbian going over mexico and then beeing misslabeled as mexican. i have read such stuff, and since then concluded this 4 years ago… mamaia. Again, im not 15 years old, i read all the concerns, and around middleamerica i therefore am very unconclusive , and look at it as middleamerican… So, ok, in favor of slightly shorten the text and relax my brain, i just used Meican as the “stongest from the region”. Sorry for that unbelevable unperfection. I cant nomore. you knwo… i have serached patterns, and every time i put out 10000000s words, and full patterns, somebody comes with “what if” what if cobcuring was the reasons, what if misslabeled, what if it was laced, what if some regions nobody sampled weed and hence less tripreports… and every single time i then present you hourlng reasonings, based on the patterns i found, often partially, or like now the whole biblical mounting story, every reasoning, every pattern combined in one post… puh, its… i dunno… its like i said, the only other alternative theory is like people just pick one uncertainity, and getting lost… what if its cobcured, and thats the reason… im telling it softer they just end up with, we dont know… and thats logical thinking… the good i have spent years to find every tripreport i ever can TO find atleast very very slight patterns , like inbreeding as a possible thing in vietnamese and congolese longflowering strain… or also to concludethat shortflowering black african or shortflowering vietnamese may be hard to recreate better than just the vietnamese collected 70s strain there already is.
anyway.
you mean on icamg, yes the tripweed thread is less “trippy” than the revival of sativa thread, and well… So, the most potent is and stays outofbody experiences, and just trust me , ive researched AAAAAAAALLLLLLOOTTTTT. thats due to that i had an insane experience on unkown weed, and i did all i could to find tripreports, and zamaldelica did not hit highscores really… NY PIFF has hallucinations reports… so you wanna tell me zamaldelica has hallucination reports? I can anwser for you, ive not seen one yet, and cause i reaserched so much, i gues you cant find one either. (that was a bit ruff, but lets see if i proove right)
thats philosphic, and zero scientifical… its just a claim of how rules behave… And ive never ever heard such a philosopie beeing use to proove somethin, or find something out.
Normally rules get found out by patterns imho… but i didnt invent or find out something yet… ahm probably i did, i once worked a s audio-scientist (freeworking) and created a plugin i yet have to test…
imho thats not a scientifical rule thats more like phylosopy
science is different in that it has to proove, and that with a higher rate of TRUTH, than the rate of UNTRUTH… so as soon as i find you exeption of a rule-as not prooving , and more often then it does, then its not truth, and is not science, atleast not official…
Also you frame it as “exeption”. however, if i correlate climate in a more complex way than just “equatorial belt” , and take into consideration “fair amounts of water” " mountains in the region, or mountainregion", and per example “seclusion” . then i end up with a rule almost…