What is the magnification there @JoeCrowe?
Sure looks like some rupture happening in a few heads.
The top photo is 10X objective and the bottom one is 4x. The actual magnification is probably 500 and 1000 times, as an estimate. IT depends on the DPI of your computerâs monitor.
Hello @ColeLennon just PM him so I donât need to flag your posts for moderation.
Yes those Aggies require a lot of special attention and funding.
Are you suggesting building buds are diluted buds?
I donât have to inform anyone about nothing, their lives, their choices, if things deppend on what I careâŚI donât rule their or your world, I wrote I donât care much donât mean I am not aware or disagree, just like I donât care much about politics.
Yeld dilution? Not familiar with that.
Amazing thank you so much @NoCal for this link.
Hereâs an attempt to highlight some timestamps:
-
~10:22 Zamir Punja states that this image of this sample of dried flower has âprobably the optimal amount of THC and CBD and terpenesâŚâ
-
~12:00 Zamir makes an analogy between a trichome head and an electrically powered lamp (lightbulb). Here, the larger the lamp, the more light it emits. Likewise, the larger the trichome head the more THC (and other cannabinoids and terpenes) the trichome is manufacturing.
-
~17:30 Zamir tells us that the length of the trichome stalk is an indicator of trichome head maturity. The lengthening of the trichome stalk also indicates a âsignificant increase in terpenoids and cannabinoidsâ
-
~18:00 We learn that the secretory disc cells increase in number, which increases the terpinoid and cannabinoid manufacture as a function of the number of secretory cells (which increase at the time of stalk elongation)
-
~19:00 how cool, cannabinoids flouresce under UV and this can be used as an indicator of cannabinoid concentration.
-
~23:00 Zamir gets the party started on maturation / ambering of trichome heads.
-
~26:40 we get a nice summary of the same stuff weâre talking here.
-
Well, tell usâŚ!!
âŚhe doesnât draw conclusions on that last line.
Great study, cool use of technology Iâd say.
- Disclaimer for those with concern over funded âAggieâ interest:
Thanks again @NoCal that was a properly fun time.
If you grow perpetually sometimes you have to take a plant earlier than youâd like. The vegging plants are usually the governor as if you have to give a flowering plant longer itâs usually makes the vegging plant uncontrollable once it gets into flower properly.
A lot of growers use the breeder times as the exact times the plants will finish. Iâve had this fight multiple times with friends that grow on a big scale. The extra week or two will only add more weight so whatâs the problem?? Means more cash.
My brain says there is a problem. Trichomes donât have a specific height they grow to, when they are done getting taller. I have grown plants with trichomes over 1mm tall and ones with trichomes 1/100th of a millimeter tall. The trichome itself undergoes a life cycle that you can watch and then time.
I had this issue before scheduling my three tent perpetual using excel:
So once I constrained the timeline and added some contingency timing, I was able to focus on other factors. Hope that inspires some planning to avoid the âharvest by forceâ issue!
You canât preemptively make chop plans and expect to have good results.
Sometimes youâve gotta do what youâve gotta do but sacrificing ripeness for space just doesnât feel right.
100% agree. In the case of the sideways waterfall chart the harvest is still taken at a time and date of the plants choosing. The schedule is updated daily and helps to keep things on track. It goes from plan to journal as the days progress.
Hereâs the first snap from the new microscope referenced in post #77:
Much more to follow once dialed in! I need way more light than itâs offering.
Young trichome, left of image, it seems like clear trichomes are all essentially mesmerizingly smooth and taught.
Cloudy trichomes seem to all share a more baggy look not as smooth, and check out the burst one at the lower area:
Does that microscope have lab software as well for measuring and exposure?
No, all visuals, It would be nice to measure some sizes I know!
@LD50 a cheaper ($17) gooseneck option are sewing machine or machine tool lights, but $70 for that Vision is way better than $130 for the AmScope, which is admittedly really nice: