We don’t use the word chlorosis for the same thing i guess, because i shown/edited previously the strict reverse of a chlorosis and it was the point, the remanence of an excess … let me check quickly.
I can’t show a more pure chlorosis than this because it’s an induced genetic marker in the context.
Maybe you’re lured by the variegations around ? (outside the perimeters i drawn)
No backward at all on this with canna, but people far more skilled than me in chemistry and phyto use it. Not unknown from my horizon.
God, i’ve to send you some seeds at one point for a couple of repros ^^
Out of my sight buddy, sorry to can’t comment this with skills.
Differents rules, so it’s even very hard to smuggle beef jerky, kid’s treats and BBQ sauce that are banned in EU ^^ Like in the other sense some cheese and “delicatessen” stuff. We always find a way, like seeds and clones lol
xx-yy-zz notation is used by some brands on the packaging/marketing, but to get the authorization to sell you have to strictly detail it like you read it on the MSDS shared. Some brands like Aptus and H&G just replicate it on their packaging instead to simplify it for clarity. Still a NPK notation, but just more literal.
It’s exactly this product yes, and i don’t advice it. It’s very particular to use, and EC pens lose their shit with it. They will read a 1.5EC by example while you’re at the double on the equivalence with a ballast-salt-based nutes line. And the funk become exponentially more complicated with each additional product you add in the soup, with a very strict sense of mixing in the sequence etc … for bottled freaks only ^^
That’s very cool.
To best picture it, i just discover yesterday totally by luck another face of one moon i ignored until today. This guy ^^
Luca’s formula management (GHE). First time i see a weed so pushed with this strategy that i’m curious to smoke, i ignored it since a while because the shit show generally linked with this formula. Sometimes only one grower strategy can change your opinion lol I’m hoping he will share some details …
Nah, they are not murdered. Maybe some amino acids, humic/fulvic stuff and a good foliar formula in your toolset to reduce the effect of this kind of “experimentation”, for further explorations of extremes ^^
I’m sad to can’t smuggle it on this specific logistic line ^^ I like to know the weed of people. Really.
The “buds on the table” discussions are my favorite ones.
For my point of view the occasional use should be an argument to push far the grade. Well in any type of context to be completely honest lol But when it belong to a philosophy, it’s not possible to argue and just an obligation to respect ;o)
Compare the plants buddy and eventually the real cost of use, i told you sincerely that the sole NPK rate don’t really matter. But the quality of the formulation and it’s assimilation by canna.
In the game of the nutrient’s list i can play it without feeling like a free add if enough large, with a genuine comment for each. When i say that i change nutes like shirt, it’s almost literal. Not a religion for me at all, and like you …
Some also are not necessary sold as hydro nutes but can be used with success in rockwool, and some are sold as hydro nutes and perform better in soil ^^ The game is wild.
With the nice spreadsheet behind, it’s dope. Thanks for the share.
But i insist, you will be surprised how much leverage can have the strategy used to mix the nutes over the NPK rate.
The famous “claws of the death”, textures are more important for me to be honest.
They just look fine and well feeded, the phototropism is stellar. Not too much or not, not enough.
Three more slots and you’re on the highway hehe
If it’s the runtz hybrid, cumulative good news for the dankness ^^ Romulan is dope too, but far more permissive and pleasant to grow. And she looooove to be pushed in hydro as fuck; prepare her well with a streamlined set you won’t regret the ride. Nice shot buddy.