Mostly selling a service on its best theoretical qualities … then improvising on the go as you can see ^^ So yes anyway, for now.
But the elements of langages are bastardized, polluting a bit the sight. Between a gen0 and gen3 by example, you’re not in front of the same product. With the gen3 you know where your feets are … it passed certifications and full sequencing.
Crazy right ? ^^
It’s not even to be fair but to share something i found interesting. A TC lab that run at good speed burn a bunch of IAA (aux). And at max productive dosage it’s not always easy to control the inertia when you cut off the amendment.
The pre-seedlings being transpirating auxins and saturated, it look like to have blocked the restart of the clones. We talked not so a long time ago about the relationship and patterns of aux’ and somatic drifts btw ^^ All of this is reading between the lines, but i found it stimulating. The solution taken, vaguely described, is to lower the pressure on TC productivity to land at the end of the chain in much lower auxin rates inertia in plants and mediums. In this case i prefer to lose two weeks on the TC cycle side and have something able to grow at the end ^^ Too.
It’s like seeds buddy ^^ Now in the clone’s game it’s very easy to spot people that don’t know shit on their old refs … unable to describe a reliable trait or even the smoke properly. To be fair, you have more obligations of results with clones than with seeds as retailer.
On IG “their Steve” is more talkative. It’s looking like as dumb that a specific PGRs formulation to dial down, specifically on IAA. What you’re calling acclimating, i totally agree … why the fuck sending this. It’s like sending embryos of seeds lol
They need food to survive ^^ Like alien the movie 