Now that’s a great suggestion
I appreciate your opinion and agree. The flagging system does have its positive uses. As I say, it’s nothing against sponsors, I just feel that if the system is going to be here, it should apply equally to all. I would think everyone would supprt equal rules for all members but I could be wrong.
And the nazi flag is not that. What was posted was the nazi flag. Pretty distinct.
Nothing to joke about.
Lad I am of Romani extraction, I know where your heads at but that ain’t what this place is. I would be the first to kick the f**k off about racism open or institutional as discrimination has been there all my life.
The swastika was addressed quickly and frankly as someone who had relatives die in those chambers someone throwing it out their in some ham-fisted comparison is barely a flicker on the scale.
Harden up my man. You’ve let the world condition you into being reactionary…take back some control ffs.
Go easy
@medmanbrand, if that’s the one you’re referring to, is no longer a sponsor.
I’m not sure how flagging is relevant to the self-moderated nature of Sponsored topics.
Same here, well half actually.
Knowledge of self
Giving these sponsors a chance to build their castle or dig their own grave. Seems fair.
That is what was posted. But as an unfortunate example.
Then came unintended consequences …
You’re pretty sensitive for a stoner.
Kushti!
If you ever need anything fella and you think I can help just PM my man.
Damn straight
The shark’s tank was closed entirely some time ago.
This is why, in part. It was causing too much division as folk built persistent grudges. This would flow into the rest of the forum.
How do we go about flagging deez nuts? Asking for a friend haha
@Sbeanonnamellow is the replied to post on or off topic? Will you flag or not?
The naughty flag posted was a joke. All this crying. I found it funny. Little ‘Nazis’ nipping about flagging posts. That’s what I got from it. If the urge takes you to behave like a Bobby Policeman then perhaps you shouldn’t. It’s just bad form imo. I certainly wouldn’t want a do gooding ‘flagger’ living next door to me.
“Cut your grass it’s in the interests of the neighbourhood.”
LJ has explained how flagging should work at the end of the other topic
If the flag system is used correctly (and not just to gain an upper hand in a discussion), it can actually save the moderators a lot of work.
How is advocating for representation of minority groups in leadership an “anti-white” thing?
Honestly I want to know. Would you care to elaborate on that?
I think it would be fair to have a mod who understands things from a different perspective than the majority of the group
Especially when it comes to experiences based on race, experiences that I try to maybe understand conceptually but will never know what it’s like to live through
Snowflake behavior for someone to flag that, it’s on the topic of federal legalization not campaigning
If the other candidate wanted to legalize cannabis then that would be okay to talk about too. Oh wait, he doesn’t want to do that so I guess it shows “preference for a side” to discuss the topic at all I suppose
Dude JAN the constant calling out of Sbean is really getting old. Same goes for the other direction - @Sbeanonnamellow i don’t think it’s helping anything by tagging @JustANobody in your posts.
We get it, you guys don’t like each other. Does anything more need to be said?
I’m not sure what’s been in the water lately
Over the last month I have seen more arguments, in-fighting, and taking sides than I’ve seen in all the previous time I’ve been here
It’s off putting to say the least
This all started because flag flag flag.
If you want to have a discussion on racism start a new thread I suggest “racism:bad”