i just heard that Landraces cant be sold… So i orientated myselve on that, namely i said that not vermount nor coloradosativa would be allowed for making money ( eg. they are guilty in the same amount).
It would be exhausting or impossible phylosophizeing with you or what you do there on english (im no native english speaker, and i cant even understand the meaning fully of your reply). i also dont know foreign copyrightlaws, so there is thin basis for me expressing any thought or person oppinion without seriously spending time
but yeah, laws are like they are i assume. Often theyre quiet understandable. If you ask about oppinions on copyrightlaws, puhh, thats pretty much one of the hardes in times of Internet… well, it was just a message about the actual laws .(atleast thats what i heard multiple times like worldwide)
jesus i have to work.
(ok a short try. I see no contradiction in how these two laws you mentioned are. ITs rather a different handling, but not in a way that it contradicts, if that makes sense. 2 different handlings, bouth protect the rights of “the folks Landraces” , and , “the persons books” . In one case the rightasker has to do something in order to get to his right, in the other not… Same as some people have to anounce something they do or want or have… So, no contradiction,i dont think so.) but im out. My english is really bad