@DougDawson - Not picking on you here, but you seem to be the mouthpiece of the coop.
It’s good we are relieving @Sebring of this pressure, it had to be a lot to deal with especially on his own. It also makes a lot of sense to establish a network of distributors.
Having said that, and with no disrespect toward any of the board members - what qualifies this group to make executive decisions as to what genetics are viable and worthy? Surely in itself the means and willingness to handle distribution does not automatically equate to expertise or critical thinking on the matter.
[quote=“DougDawson, post:21, topic:83613”] These are criteria that will be looked at on a case by case basis.
[/quote]
This dismisses rather than answers @Foreigner’s question. Unless you can articulate the broad outlines of a methodology or set of criterial questions the “case by case” response reads as a lackluster stand-in for “we will decide arbitrarily.”
Can you put some methodological meat on the bones for us?
Also, help me out here,
What bearing does the OG1/Emery fiasco have to do with our current situation? That line reads like something of a fear-mongering straw man, as if OG presently hangs in the balance.
Yea, but…
Claims that this is not about “control” in some way are false on the face of them. Instead, and in addition to providing strain selection criteria requested above, an equally clear statement as to just what it is you are attempting to control and what you are not would be very helpful.