This sound kinda like what I was asking a few weeks ago, at least in that I was asking about “the low P number”. But I was actually seeing/thinking I saw P deficiency (would it could be, but not cause by a lack of P in the solution).
When I started looking more closely at other formulas and their elemental ppm levels of N at different application rate they seems pretty close to Megacrop. Then I had to question why I thought P was “low”. I was thinking it was low compared to something like a “lucas ratio”, which has about double the P, and is used as a “one part” from veg to finish. So I was thinking, essentially, "why would the P amount on Megacrop (for example) be so much lower than this - when there’s no negative effect (perceivable?) from having twice as much - and I’ll possibly/probably need more in flower later.
It’s the amount of P compared to N that people are looking at, I think. Because it’s a 1-part! People immediately make the connection that they can’t (drastically) reduce N without reducing the entire nutrient level (I know, you can add BE).
Just trying to explain maybe one reasoning as to why people keep asking this.
Also, I’m curious. What “sacrifices” or methods (as far as you can share anyway, haha) were used to even be able to put everything in one bag. The whole mixing CalNit with Sulfates/Phosphates being an incompatibility seems pretty strict.
There’s also one or two liquid one parts out now and I don’t get how they can do it? Do they just use such low levels of one or the other to stay under a level where they react so aggressively?
Thanks for any insight.