Landraces of India

Interesting. Can you find us a picture? There is debate about whether small humans are shown in the hieroglyphics or whether giant humanoids are shown next to normal sized people.

6 Likes

What I would give to get a genetic sample of that hash that was found in South American mummies. I’m sure that must have come from the Egyptians or Phoenicians, as cannabis was not known in the Western Hemisphere at that time or at least we haven’t found evidence of it yet. …and surely no hash production occured. It would be neat to get a CBD THC( likely now cbn or other cannabinoids)ratio.

6 Likes

I once saw it while researching Medu Neter(Kemetic hieroglyphs) in a college library. I will dig for the source material and post it when I find it.

3 Likes

There’s no evidence the Egyptians talked to South Americans back then, at least no evidence science agrees on. But you actually just posted evidence that cannabis was in South America.

2 Likes

Henut Taui - (1000 BCE) was an Ancient Egyptian priestess during the [21st Dynasty] whose remains were mummified

In 1992, German toxicologist Svetlana Balabanova discovered traces of cocaine, hashish and nicotine on Henut Taui’s hair as well as on the hair of several other mummies of the museum , which is significant in that the only source for cocaine and nicotine had at that time been considered to be the coca and tobacco plants native to the Americas, and were not thought to have been present in Africa until after Columbus voyaged to the Americas…

8 Likes

So two possibilities. Coca and tobacco were always in Africa and were grown by the locals or they traded with the South Americans. You would have to rewrite history either way.

4 Likes

Was introduced from the Americas.

The Indian coca plant…

https://indianmedicinalplants.info/Medicinal-Plants/indian-medicinal-plants-8_files/Page6273.html

2 Likes

Except that there is no evidence of that. It was argued before that some other plants from Africa containing nicotine and cocaine alkaloids must have been used by the Egyptians. There is no historical or archaeological evidence for this nor are there any hieroglyphs showing such things . It all comes down to whether you believe the research these particular people did on those mummies. Some people will never be able to depart from the mainstream narrative no matter what it is . I myself have a tough time believing somebody would plant both cocaine and hash in ancient mummies, and an even a harder time believing an academic would do it. To what end? What’s the motive? To get yourself ridiculed and blacklisted? To lose any funding for eternity?
Furthermore these deposits were found in mummies from both South America AND Egypt, suggesting a connection. Cocaine and tobacco found in the lungs or stomachs of Egyptians and hash found in the lungs or stomachs of South Americans. I don’t recall where they found it without rereading the article. If you are willing to look into it, this is far from the only connection between the two Hemispheres. Massive statues depicting obviously dark-skinned Africans have also been found in Mexico for example. DNA testing of some red-haired mummies of the ruling class in Peru has shown that they most likely came from the Caucasus mountains in Europe long, long before Colombus…2-3,000 years ago) and no one is disputing this. The copper used in Bronze Age Europe is the purist on Earth and through testing we know that it was not melted down and altered to make it pure. It was found this way and there is only one location known on Earth that produces such pure copper, and that is in the Great Lakes on an island . DNA testing of natives around the Lakes show a relation to the Phoenicians. We know for a fact that long before the accepted timeline, people from the Eastern Hemisphere made it to the Western Hemisphere. Not only one group either. Vikings, Phoenicians, the Templars, the Chinese, the Polynesians…



![Screenshot_20240611_075424_Chrome|225x500](upload://eP8a4MiPy7OMJUGsyC0FRm6S02v.jpeg

)http://www.faculty.ucr.edu/~legneref/ethnic/muhttps://youtu.be/56TrKNDHVU8?si=rSf-04QiaBcJII_Uhttps://youtu.be/56TrKNDHVU8?si=rSf-04QiaBcJII_Uhttps://youtu.be/PP9B6l_burY?si=nLCM2T2an77F0sxy

7 Likes

I feel smarter just reading that. This is the first thing I read after taking some bong rips and drinking coffee. Thinking like this always opens my mind. I’ve been tripping a few times lately and I keep getting this don’t forget that “we are ancient” message kind of with the echo of Lee scratch perry and the voice of a Greek myth, real minimal but kind of profound. Anyway good morning all. Hope everyone’s plants and family are doing well.

8 Likes

People have a tough time ridding themselves of long standing tradition

5 Likes

People always claiming wild shit, should be held to standard. Otherwise we are just parroting whatever we want to be true.

7 Likes

Reading this was totally worth it just for the picture in my head of archeologists snorting cocaine while preserving mummies :sweat_smile:

Also I stole the book that Upstate mentioned from the internet. Interesting topic that I don’t know anything about.

8 Likes

I love all this history and theory where things came from good stuff. One argument I haven’t heard yet is Pangea. All land mass as one continent so things would and could spread easily by nature. Just a thought in my head.

5 Likes

http://www.faculty.ucr.edu/~legneref/ethnic/mummy.htm
Here’s a good rebuttal. It goes into detail on why the findings were accurate.
The denial by the scientific Community didn’t have so much to do with the way they did their tests but that the results must have been flawed simply because these plants were not known to be in both hemispheres at that time, and since there was no evidence of Intercontinental visiting, there must have been a mistake in the tests… which were performed by another group later with similar results. That’s a pretty thin argument at best

2 Likes

All he talked about was the techniques used. It doesn’t refute anything. A lot of quotes though.


This part.
In my opinion saying the results were skewed because no one has found those results before is not a refutement at all. Show me how the tests were done wrong… that would be refuting the evidence. I can’t even count how many times recently archaeological evidence has been found completely destroying mainstream thought processes. Now we know irrefutably from( lidar) ground penetrating radar photos that a branch of the Nile river flowed at the base of the pyramids. The main Egyptian pyramid scholar has been saying that’s impossible for years. Majority of Egyptian Pyramids Was Built along Long-Lost Branch of Nile, Archaeologists Say | Sci.News Zahi Hawas also told us there were not any entrances into the Sphinx, and we know that’s untrue now too. The oldest civilization on Earth was the Sumerians. Ooops. Not anymore. Two sites in Turkey twice as old are now( were rather. The WEF has stopped it as they somehow control the excavation) under excavation and have been for quite some timehttps://www.theartnewspaper.com/2021/11/17/discovery-turkey-karahan-tepe
Archeology is full of discoveries we didn’t expect. I remember I was given a tough time when I posted about lost civilizations in the Amazon not long ago. https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.7087760
Mainstream archeology is just now coming around to the Atlantis was in Mauritania evidence. Give it 10 years and I’ll be writing about how I was posting about that before it was accepted as even possible.
There is a difference between having caution and closing ones eyes when it comes to new evidence. Blind dismissal is premature, and i see it happening all the time by the mainstream.
One word should be removed from every archaeologists and scientists lips. The word is
Impossible.

8 Likes

Only took two years and lots of harassing and I finally got my seeds. Was supposed to get more but at least I got something. They’re all supposed to be ones that can have Mango terps. I may plant them all outside and cross them to a pure Indica. Then I’ll just keep the seeds from the ones I like.

23 Likes

You planning make pure seeds?

7 Likes

Nope, I may cross the pure Indica to pure Sativa and see what happens. Or I may just pick a bunch of proven male strains and just let them get pollinated by a bunch of different males so I have more diversity to choose from.

5 Likes

Lots of luck with that.

2 Likes