Life after Death?

How is that proof? Can I examine the writings and prove them false?

No, but I guess that’s why they call it faith.

2 Likes

You actually can if you want, just compare the four gospels and they contradict each other on certain things.
/me runs for cover

2 Likes

hah hah that’s a really good answer. You ever wonder if your god can microwave a burrito so hot that they can’t eat it?

1 Like

As a combat vet, who has looked at death more times than I care to admit too, I know one thing. I would rather believe in God and be wrong, than not believe and be wrong. Life lessons for me.

5 Likes

Pascal’s wager is indeed an excellent basis for true belief. :wink: :rofl:

3 Likes

Hahaha, I will take it :joy: As most others do also :rofl::joy:

1 Like

what if you are betting on the wrong god?

Someone is always wrong :joy::rofl: But I find no issues trying to lead a decent life, and if if attributing that to whatever you like, is it, then so be it. We will all find out one day, it’s a debt that comes due to us all.

2 Likes

Risk vs reward. If you’re right; hey you get your afterlife. You’re wrong well… say there is 100 religions. You had a 1:100 chance of getting it right, yeah? But a lot higher chance in getting it wrong.

Some people aren’t plagued with endless questions in their head, lucky bastards.

So what if you’re wrong? What if the religion you chose is wrong? Well… I don’t know. I believe the topic was to hear what other people think not repeat our own thoughts.

2 Likes

I know this is the problem with pascals wager, it’s got no chance of being right. What about in a thousand years an alien race shows up and they have their own god they can prove exists and their god is very angry that you were worshipping false gods. At least if I don’t believe in any gods existence, a real god would be an intelligent being and know that I can’t believe in things that have no proof.

It’s especially got no chance of being right because any halfway decent god would know if you’re choosing to “believe” based solely on pragmatism… of course, any halfway decent god wouldn’t be condemning anyone to eternal torture based on personal worship or lack thereof, that’s a human trait and a rather petty one at that. I’d still rather just let people believe what they want, most of the time it’s not worth the argument trying to convert anyone… and I have nothing much to convert anyone to, unless shrugging and smoking another bowl is a belief system. :stuck_out_tongue:

4 Likes

yah but the underlying theme of betting on gods existence is what can be proven to be false. Have you ever tried to calculate the permutation or combination of infinity? That’s what pascal forgot to mention. Any god from the past or future could exist after all, with no proof.

In Hinduism and Buddhism, nirvana is the highest state that someone can attain, a state of enlightenment, meaning a person’s individual desires and suffering have been transcended…

“Shunyata” - the unmanifest, the void, emptiness…

2 Likes

5 Likes

heh heh for sure it’s derived from the sanskrit world for “extinction”.
the buddah described it as:
“incomprehensible, indescribable, inconceivable, unutterable”
Then like… teaches you how to reach that place? I wonder if there are any dogs in nirvana?

the teaching - it is not the desire or wants - but rather our attachments to them that cause suffering - dukkha

nirvana might be thought of as heaven - but it is not a place you go when you die - better understood as a state of mind… so yes for dogs - until they get really emotional stressed… just like the rest of us :slight_smile:

1 Like

ooof yah… I guess my far darker question about Buddhism is why they can do the eightfold path and the threefold training and still commit atrocities against say… “other religions” cough sri lanka. I know it’s an ugly can of worms. Shit, that is a lot darker than my original softball question.

Yes, no atrocities have been committed as a result of science.

3 Likes